Tuesday, April 5
Monday, April 4, 2011
Sunday, April 3, 2011
The Texas A&M forecasts are in:
Monday, April 4
2011-04-04 12Z - forecast only
2011-04-04 06Z - forecast only
2011-04-04 00Z - forecast only
I also found some readings from KEK in Tokyo, that are similar but more frequently updated than the SPEED! measurements. They are here and here. As shown earlier, these measurements show several spikes stemming from the releases from the reactors and a larger set of bump starting around March 21st that seem to correlate with the pool cooling events. As soon as the pools are filled, i.e. cooled, the sources terms stops immediately.
At the start of the accidents, there was not much data with regards to the source term at Fukushima, i.e how much elements were escaping from the reactors. Most of the computations performed by different groups were focused on a worst case scenario of continuous release, which was never supported by any of the SPEED! measurements. The simulations include:
- Special Forecast products for Fukushima produced by NILU-ATMOS (disclaimer: These products are highly uncertain based on limited information for the source terms. Please use with caution and understand that the values are likely to change once we obtain more information on the overall nature of the accident. The products should be considered informational and only indicate 'worst case scenario' releases. From what we've learned recently, it seems releases of this magnitude have not yet occurred. Furthermore, these modeling products are based on global meteorological data, which are too coarse to provide reliable details of the transport of the plume across Japan.)
- Eurad simulations. (Fukushima site) Disclaimer: This simulation is a so called "worst case scenario" with continuous release rate. The value of 0001 Bq / m 3 correspond to appr. one millionth of the concentration at the source. At distances more than appr. 2000 km away from the source, the concentrations are not harmful to health. The simulation starts at fictitious 15.03. 00 UTC and will continue to run in order to Demonstrate the InterContinental. Relaese exact transport When rates are published we will restart the simulation with reliable values.
When given more data from the CTBTO, the german Eurad model was re-run and the dispersion model was compared as to when CTBTO stations would detect the plume from the Fukushima plant. The animated gif is here.
and seems to show a pretty good fit with regards to when the stations would detect elements given the new simulations. Finally, an NOAA HYSPLIT model is currently being run by somebody which seems to give similar result with regards to particle trajectories. It is here.
Saturday, April 2, 2011
The Texas A&M prediction maps for April 3rd are in:
Sunday, April 3
2011-04-03 12Z - forecast only
2011-04-03 06Z - forecast only
2011-04-03 00Z - forecast only
Saturday, April 2
2011-04-02 18Z - forecast only
2011-04-02 12Z - forecast only
2011-04-02 06Z - forecast only
2011-04-02 00Z - forecast only
Looks there is a chance for some radiation monitoring station in Taiwan and South Korea to pick up similar radiation patterns as those detected by University of Washington and UC Berkeley (i.e. barely detectable, very low level). Cheryl Rofer has an entry on bits and pieces related to the Fukushima accident. Of interest is the entry on what we know with regards to radiation effect on people.
Friday, April 1, 2011
There is a new report from UC Berkeley that provides a timeline of the radiation measurements. The report is here:
Of interest today is the peak observed on March 24th (California time = GMT - 9). If one checks the Texas A&M maps, it looks like there is a possibility to connect this peak to a source term around March 20th at around midnight (GMT) or a little bit before.
The TEPCO press release for that time frame show something new that day among other things:
Cooling of spent fuel pools At approximately 8:21 am, March 20th, water discharge to Unit 4 by fire engine has started with the cooperation of Self-Defense Forces.Or because the graph shows counting performed for the whole day in California (as opposed to actual time period) another later event:
Cooling of Spent Fuel From 3: 05 PM to 5: 20 PM on March 20th, 40 tons of seawater was injected into Unit 2 by TEPCO employees.
The finding seems consistent with any of two source terms occurring at
- 8:31 AM on March 20th, or about midnight March 20th (GMT) and,
- 3:05PM/5:20PM on March 20th or about (6:00AM GMT March 20th).
The detection in California has occurred around March 24th (PST) or about March 24th/March 25th (GMT).
Hence it becomes difficult to delineate which of the two source terms was effectively detected at Berkeley. Now let us watch the Tokyo measurements. it shows a start at about 8:00 am March 21st (JST)
which seems consistent with reactor #4 pool cooldown. The second peak seems connected to the reactor #2 cooldown but it could also be connected to the smoke observed on top of unit 3 (March 21), however that would seem unlikely since according to TEPCO environmental readings remained at the same level when the fumes occurred. Once the cooldown is obtained and stable, there is no expectation of further release to the environment. The expectation is now that the radiation measurements should continue decreasing (irrespective of whether the winds are westerly).